Trademark search for:

MAXI LD

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2000-11-16 — Application filed
2001-03-23 — Assigned to examiner
2001-03-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-08-01 — Notice of publication
2001-08-21 — Published for opposition
2001-11-13 — Registered-principal register
2007-01-16 — Case file in ticrs
2007-12-20 — Paper received
2007-12-20 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2007-12-28 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-01-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-05-09 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2011-06-15 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-06-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2015-10-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-10-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-12-07 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2019-10-23 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2020-11-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-01-12 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2022-05-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-05-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CORDIS US CORP
MIAMI LAKES , FL

CARDINAL HEALTH 529, LLC
DUBLIN , OH

CARDINAL HEALTH SWITZERLAND 515 GMBH
BAAR CH

Cordis Corporation
BRIDGEWATER , NJ

Cordis Corporation
Miami Lakes , FL

Cordis Corporation
Miami Lakes , FL

Correspondent

N. Christopher Norton Arent Fox LLP
1717 K Street NW
Washington, DC 20006-5344
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-11-16

Status Date:
2022-05-27

Category:
Medical Apparatus

Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.