Brandinium

Trademark search for:

TEOSYS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-08-22 — Application filed
  • 2001-10-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2001-11-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-04-29 — Paper received
  • 2002-04-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-06-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2002-06-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-09-09 — Paper received
  • 2002-09-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-09-26 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2002-12-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-01-09 — Paper received
  • 2003-01-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-01-09 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
  • 2003-02-21 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2003-02-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-05-07 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-05-27 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-08-19 — Registered-principal register
  • 2007-10-03 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
  • 2008-04-02 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
  • 2008-05-14 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2008-07-10 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
  • 2008-07-10 — Cancelled section 18-total
  • 2008-07-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MONOLITH CO., LTD.
Tokyo 106-0045 JP
MONOLITH CO., LTD.
Tokyo 106-0045 JP
MONOLITH CO., LTD.
Tokyo 106-0045 JP

Correspondent

B. Joseph Schaeff Killworth, Gottman, Hagan & Schaeff LLP
1 S Main Street
Suite 500
Dayton, OH 45402-2074

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-08-22
Status Date:
2008-07-10
Category:
Medical Apparatus
Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.