Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical Apparatus ›
2004 ›
FI ›
FINE FREQUENCY
Trademark search for:
FINE FREQUENCY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-10-22 — Application filed
2004-11-01 — Application filed
2005-05-26 — Assigned to examiner
2005-06-10 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-06-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-06-10 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2005-06-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
2005-06-17 — Assigned to lie
2005-06-22 — Law office publication review completed
2005-09-21 — Notice of publication
2005-10-11 — Published for opposition
2006-01-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-07-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-07-12 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2006-07-12 — Petition to revive-granted
2006-07-12 — Teas petition to revive received
2006-08-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-12-07 — Sou teas extension received
2006-12-07 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-12-07 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-07-03 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-12-06 — Application abandoned
2007-12-14 — Application abandoned
2008-01-04 — Final status recorded
2008-01-07 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-01-07 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-01-07 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-01-16 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-03-05 — Application abandoned
2008-03-05 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Med-El Corporation
Durham , NC
Med-El Corporation
Durham , NC
Correspondent
Eric P. Stevens POYNER & SPRUILL L.L.P. 3600 GLENWOOD AVE RALEIGH, NC 27612-4945 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-10-22
Status Date:
2008-01-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.