Trademark search for:

ORTHOHELIX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2011-01-06 — Application filed
2011-01-10 — Application filed
2011-01-11 — Application filed
2011-01-12 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2011-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2011-03-22 — Assigned to examiner
2011-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-02 — Paper received
2011-09-07 — Assigned to lie
2011-09-09 — Amendment from applicant entered
2011-09-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-09-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-10-01 — Law office publication review completed
2011-10-19 — Notice of publication
2011-11-08 — Published for opposition
2012-01-24 — Registered-principal register
2012-10-10 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2012-10-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-10-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-10-28 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2016-01-21 — Teas change of owner address received
2016-01-21 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2017-01-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2018-08-31 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2018-08-31 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

OrthoHelix Surgical Designs, Inc.
Bloomington , MN

OrthoHelix Surgical Designs, Inc.
Medina , OH

OrthoHelix Surgical Designs, Inc.
Medina , OH

Correspondent

Barbara J. Grahn Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, LLP
222 South Ninth Street
Suite 2000
Minneapolis, MN 55402

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-01-06

Status Date:
2018-08-31

Category:
Medical Apparatus

Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.