Trademark search for:

CPS VISIO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2005-11-16 — Application filed
2005-11-22 — Application filed
2006-05-22 — Assigned to examiner
2006-05-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-05-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-05-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-05-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-05-30 — Assigned to lie
2006-06-30 — Assigned to lie
2006-07-10 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-09 — Notice of publication
2006-08-29 — Published for opposition
2006-11-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-05-09 — Sou teas extension received
2007-05-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-08-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-11-19 — Sou teas extension received
2007-11-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-12-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-05-13 — Sou teas extension received
2008-05-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-05-22 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-11-19 — Sou teas extension received
2008-11-19 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-11-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-11-21 — Sou extension 4 granted
2009-05-19 — Sou teas extension received
2009-05-19 — Sou extension 5 filed
2009-05-20 — Sou extension 5 granted
2009-12-21 — Application abandoned
2009-12-21 — Application abandoned
2009-12-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Pacesetter, Inc.
Sylmar , CA

Pacesetter, Inc.
Sylmar , CA

Correspondent

Steven M. Mitchell PACESETTER, INC.
15900 Valley View Court
SYLMAR, CA 91342
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-11-16

Status Date:
2009-12-21

Category:
Medical Apparatus

Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.