Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical Apparatus ›
2005 ›
DI ›
DIATON
Trademark search for:
DIATON
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-03-03 — Application filed
2006-06-22 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2006-06-23 — Application filed
2006-06-23 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-29 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-30 — Office action issued
2006-06-30 — Office action issued
2006-06-30 — Office action issued
2006-07-22 — Office action issued
2007-02-01 — Application abandoned
2007-02-01 — Application abandoned
2007-02-28 — Paper received
2007-02-28 — Petition to revive-received
2007-04-02 — Petition granted - response received
2007-04-04 — Assigned to lie
2007-04-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-04-13 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-05-02 — Office action issued
2007-05-02 — Office action issued
2007-07-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-07-27 — Office action issued
2007-07-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-30 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2007-07-30 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2007-08-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-08-24 — Office action issued
2007-08-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-08-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-08-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-08-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-08-27 — Assigned to lie
2007-08-31 — Assigned to lie
2007-09-05 — Law office publication review completed
2007-09-19 — Notice of publication
2007-10-09 — Published for opposition
2007-10-11 — Assigned to examiner
2007-11-22 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2007-11-22 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2007-12-06 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2007-12-25 — Registered-principal register
2008-03-27 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-08 — Final disposition recorded
2008-12-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-06 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
2013-02-21 — Teas section 71 & 15 received
2013-03-20 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-03-27 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 71 & 15
2013-04-05 — Office action issued
2013-04-05 — Registered - sec. 71 & sec. 15 filed
2013-04-08 — Registered - sec. 71 accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2013-04-08 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 & 15 - e-mailed
2015-03-19 — International registration renewed
2016-12-25 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (10-yr) e-mailed
2017-10-11 — Teas section 71 received
2017-10-17 — Registered-sec.71 accepted
2017-10-17 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 - e-mailed
2018-06-17 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
2018-06-20 — Generic madrid transaction created
2018-06-20 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
2018-08-17 — Partial invalidation processed by the ib
2025-03-03 — Final status recorded
2025-09-26 — Death of international registration
2025-09-26 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
Joint Stock Company "Ryazan State Instrument- making Enterprise" (JSCo "RSIE"),
Ryazan RU
Federalnoe gosudarstvennoe unitarnoe; predpriyatie "Gosudarstvenny; Ryazansky proborny zavod"
RU
Federalnoe gosudarstvennoe unitarnoe; predpriyatie "Gosudarstvenny; Ryazansky proborny zavod"
RU
Correspondent
James A. Larson HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, PC. 45 South Seventh Street, Suite 2700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-03-03
Status Date:
2025-03-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.