Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical Apparatus ›
2006 ›
CE ›
CELLACTOR
Trademark search for:
CELLACTOR
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-10-26 — Application filed
2006-10-30 — Application filed
2006-10-31 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2007-03-08 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-08 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-08 — Assigned to examiner
2007-08-03 — Office action issued
2007-08-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-09-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-09-12 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-09-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-09-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-09-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-09-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-10-12 — Assigned to lie
2007-10-13 — Law office publication review completed
2007-10-31 — Notice of publication
2007-11-20 — Published for opposition
2008-02-12 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-07-29 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2008-07-29 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2008-07-30 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-07-30 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2008-09-02 — Registered-principal register
2015-04-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2015-04-03 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Storz Medical AG
Taegerwilen CH
Storz Medical AG
Taegerwilen CH
Storz Medical AG
Taegerwilen CH
Correspondent
WESLEY W WHITMYER JR ST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC 986 BEDFORD ST STAMFORD, CT 06905-5619 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-10-26
Status Date:
2015-04-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.