Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical Apparatus ›
2006 ›
CH ›
CHROMA 2 TECHNOLOGY
Trademark search for:
CHROMA 2 TECHNOLOGY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-08-10 — Application filed
2006-08-16 — Application filed
2006-08-17 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2007-01-05 — Assigned to examiner
2007-01-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-01-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-01-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-01-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-02-24 — Assigned to lie
2007-02-24 — Law office publication review completed
2007-03-21 — Notice of publication
2007-04-10 — Published for opposition
2007-06-26 — Registered-principal register
2009-08-05 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2011-06-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-06-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-09-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-09-04 — Teas section 8 received
2012-09-21 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-09-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2012-09-21 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2014-07-31 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-06-26 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-02-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-02-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ENORMX, LLC
SPRINGVILLE , UT
Lumiport, LLC
Orem , UT
Lumiport, LLC
Orem , UT
Lumiport, LLC
Orem , UT
Correspondent
STEVE P. HASSID Partners Law Group, Inc. 1115 1/2 Yale Street Santa Monica, CA 90403 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-08-10
Status Date:
2018-02-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.