Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical Apparatus ›
2007 ›
PE ›
PERFORMANCE REDEFINED
Trademark search for:
PERFORMANCE REDEFINED
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-02-09 — Application filed
2004-02-22 — Application filed
2004-07-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-07-23 — Assigned to examiner
2004-08-03 — Assigned to lie
2004-08-05 — Law office publication review completed
2004-09-22 — Notice of publication
2004-10-12 — Published for opposition
2005-01-04 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-04-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2005-04-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-06-28 — Paper received
2005-06-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-06-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-12-05 — Paper received
2005-12-05 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-12-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-04-25 — Sou teas extension received
2006-04-25 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-05-12 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-12-12 — Sou teas extension received
2006-12-12 — Sou extension 4 granted
2006-12-12 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-06-27 — Sou teas extension received
2007-06-27 — Sou extension 5 filed
2007-06-27 — Sou extension 5 granted
2008-01-05 — Final status recorded
2008-03-05 — Application abandoned
2008-03-05 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Murray Hill , NJ
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Murray Hill , NJ
Correspondent
ROBERTA S BREN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST 1940 DUKE ST ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-02-09
Status Date:
2008-01-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.