Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical Apparatus ›
2009 ›
NU ›
NU-BABE
Trademark search for:
NU-BABE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-10-20 — Application filed
2005-10-25 — Application filed
2006-04-25 — Assigned to examiner
2006-04-27 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-04-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-04-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-05-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-05-05 — Assigned to lie
2006-05-09 — Law office publication review completed
2006-06-07 — Notice of publication
2006-06-27 — Published for opposition
2006-09-19 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-03-13 — Sou teas extension received
2007-03-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-06-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-08-27 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-10-04 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-03-18 — Sou teas extension received
2008-03-18 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-04-04 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-09-18 — Sou teas extension received
2008-09-18 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-09-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-22 — Sou extension 4 granted
2009-03-18 — Sou teas extension received
2009-03-18 — Sou extension 5 filed
2009-03-18 — Sou extension 5 granted
2009-10-19 — Application abandoned
2009-10-19 — Application abandoned
2009-10-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
HOUSLEY, TODD B
dallas , TX
HOUSLEY, TODD B
dallas , TX
Correspondent
Michael W. Dubner Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP 1601 Elm Street, Suite 3000 DALLAS, TX 75201 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-10-20
Status Date:
2009-10-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.