Trademark search for:

STAY-FIT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2017-05-02 — Application filed
2017-05-05 — Application filed
2017-05-08 — Application filed
2017-05-09 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2017-07-29 — Assigned to examiner
2017-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
2017-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
2017-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
2017-09-16 — Office action issued
2017-09-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-09-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-10-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-10-27 — Assigned to lie
2017-11-15 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-12-05 — Published for opposition
2017-12-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2018-01-30 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-07-30 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2018-09-03 — Application abandoned
2018-09-04 — Application abandoned
2018-09-17 — Teas petition to revive received
2018-09-17 — Petition to revive-granted
2018-09-17 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2018-09-27 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-09-27 — New noa to issue
2018-11-06 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2019-06-10 — Application abandoned
2019-06-10 — Application abandoned
2019-06-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Fernando G. Rivadeneyra
San Diego , CA

Fernando G. Rivadeneyra
San Diego , CA

Correspondent

FERNANDO G. RIVADENEYRA
3604 GEORGIA ST, 205
3604 GEORGIA ST, 205
SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-05-02

Status Date:
2019-06-10

Category:
Medical Apparatus

Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.