Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LUDLOY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1965-02-23 — Application filed
  • 1986-04-23 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
  • 1986-04-23 — Request for new certificate filed
  • 1986-04-26 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 20 yrs)
  • 1986-06-23 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 9
  • 1987-01-12 — New certificate under section 7 - processed
  • 2003-06-09 — Paper received
  • 2004-02-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-02-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-09-06 — Paper received
  • 2005-09-06 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2005-09-06 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2005-10-01 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2005-10-08 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2005-10-08 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2015-04-26 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2020-03-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-03-16 — Final status recorded
  • 2023-08-30 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership

Owner Information

METSO OUTOTEC FINLAND OY
TAMPERE FI
METSO MINERALS INDUSTRIES, INC.
WAUKESHA , WI
LUKENS GENERAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
COATESVILLE , PA
LUDLOW-SAYLOR WIRE CLOTH COMPANY
ST. LOUIS , MO

Correspondent

JO M FAIRBAIRN KINNEY & LANGE
312 S 3RD ST
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415-1002
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1965-02-23
Status Date:
2020-03-16
Category:
Metals
Filing Year:
1965

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.