Trademark search for:

QUIKHINGE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1993-10-04 — Application filed
1994-03-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
1994-04-08 — Notice of publication
1994-05-10 — Published for opposition
1994-08-02 — Registered-principal register
2000-08-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2000-11-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2004-04-07 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-05-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-05-25 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2007-07-20 — Case file in ticrs
2014-03-27 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2014-03-27 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2014-04-10 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2014-04-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2014-04-10 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2014-04-10 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2023-08-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2025-02-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2025-02-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MODGAL METAL (99) LTD.
ROSH PINA 12000 IL

MOGDAL LTD
ROSH PINA 1200 IL

QUIKCOUP, INCORPORATED
Houghton , MI

QUIKCOUP, INCORPORATED
Houghton , MI

QUIKCOUP, INCORPORATED
Houghton , MI

Correspondent

Geoffrey D. Aurini Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.
5445 Corporate Drive
Suite 200
Troy, MI 48098

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1993-10-04

Status Date:
2025-02-14

Category:
Metals

Filing Year:
1993

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.