Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CINTAC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1994-01-25 — Application filed
  • 1994-06-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1994-06-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1994-12-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1994-12-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1995-05-12 — Notice of publication
  • 1995-06-13 — Published for opposition
  • 1995-09-05 — Registered-principal register
  • 2001-08-31 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2001-09-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2005-08-16 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2005-08-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2005-08-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2005-12-31 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2005-12-31 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2005-12-31 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2011-05-02 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2011-05-26 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2012-04-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-03-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-03-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-04-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-04-10 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CINTAC S.A.
SANTIAGO CL
CINTAC S.A.
SANTIAGO CL
CINTAC S.A.
SANTIAGO CL

Correspondent

J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON PEATMAN & FOGARTY
1455 FIRST STREET, STE 301
NAPA, CA 94559
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1994-01-25
Status Date:
2020-04-10
Category:
Metals
Filing Year:
1994

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.