Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SANDVIK NANOFLEX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-06-03 — Application filed
  • 2002-10-01 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-10-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2002-10-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-04-04 — Paper received
  • 2003-04-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-05-01 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-05-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-06-18 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-07-08 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-09-04 — Fax sent
  • 2003-09-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2004-02-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2004-02-19 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2004-02-19 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2004-02-19 — Use amendment filed
  • 2004-03-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2004-03-10 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2004-03-11 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-03-16 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2004-06-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2010-03-29 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2010-04-09 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2010-04-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2014-03-27 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2014-03-27 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2014-04-10 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2014-04-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2014-04-10 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2014-04-10 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2016-04-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-04-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-11-03 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-11-03 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-11-03 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-11-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-11-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-12-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-12-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-12-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-12-27 — Teas withdrawal as domestic representative received
  • 2021-12-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-12-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-12-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-12-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-12-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2022-01-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2022-01-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-01-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2023-06-01 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2024-03-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2024-03-29 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2024-03-29 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2024-03-29 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2024-03-29 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2024-12-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2024-12-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB
SANDVIKEN SE
SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY HB
SANDVIKEN SE
Sandvik AB
SE
Sandvik AB
SE
Sandvik AB
SE

Correspondent

Ben Natter Haug Partners, LLP
745 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10151
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-06-03
Status Date:
2024-12-13
Category:
Metals
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.