Brandinium

Trademark search for:

FASTER LEANER BETTER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-10-22 — Application filed
  • 2008-10-27 — Application filed
  • 2009-01-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-01-23 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-01-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-07-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-07-23 — Office action issued
  • 2009-07-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-08-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-08-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-08-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-12-29 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-01-05 — Fax received
  • 2010-01-05 — Fax received
  • 2010-01-14 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-01-14 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-02-05 — Data modification completed
  • 2010-02-12 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-02-12 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-12 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-23 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2010-02-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-02-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-23 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-02-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-02-23 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2010-02-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2010-08-24 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-08-27 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2010-08-27 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-08-27 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-01-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2011-01-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-01-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-01-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-01-25 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-03-01 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-03-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2011-04-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-07-14 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
  • 2011-07-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-07-18 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2011-07-18 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2011-10-04 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-09-13 — Paper received
  • 2012-09-25 — Review of correspondence complete - address not updated
  • 2017-09-29 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2017-10-22 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-10-22 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
  • 2018-04-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2018-04-05 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2020-10-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2021-07-14 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2021-07-30 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2021-09-03 — Office action issued
  • 2022-03-02 — Office action issued
  • 2022-03-17 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2022-03-25 — Office action issued
  • 2022-10-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)
  • 2022-10-07 — Final status recorded
  • 2022-10-08 — Notice of cancellation sec. 8 emailed

Owner Information

Cogan Wire & Metal Products Ltd.
Terrebonne CA
Cogan Wire & Metal Products Ltd.
Terrebonne CA
Cogan Wire & Metal Products Ltd.
Terrebonne CA

Correspondent

Mark A. Watkins Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
P.O. Box 2255
Columbus, OH 43216-2255
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-10-22
Status Date:
2022-10-07
Category:
Metals
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.