Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Metals ›
2009 ›
BL ›
BLUE AND WHITE STRAND
Trademark search for:
BLUE AND WHITE STRAND
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-06-08 — Application filed
2009-06-11 — Application filed
2009-06-11 — Application filed
2009-09-08 — Assigned to examiner
2009-09-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-15 — Final disposition recorded
2010-02-04 — Office action issued
2010-02-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-02-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-03-01 — Suspension letter written
2010-03-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-03-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-09-03 — Assigned to lie
2010-09-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-09-27 — Suspension inquiry written
2010-09-27 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2010-09-27 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2011-03-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-03-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-03-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-03-24 — Suspension letter written
2011-03-24 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-03-24 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-06-30 — Teas amendment of use received
2011-07-01 — Amendment to use processing complete
2011-07-01 — Use amendment filed
2011-07-18 — Suspension letter written
2011-07-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-07-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-11-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-11-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-11-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-11-16 — Use amendment accepted
2011-11-17 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2012-01-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-02-06 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-02-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2012-02-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2012-02-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2012-02-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-02-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-02-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-02-21 — Law office publication review completed
2012-03-05 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2012-03-12 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2012-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-09-18 — Office action issued
2012-09-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-10-10 — Office action issued
2012-10-10 — Office action issued
2012-10-10 — Office action issued
2012-12-06 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-12-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-12-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-12-07 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2012-12-21 — Law office publication review completed
2013-01-29 — Registered-supplemental register
2015-12-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2015-12-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2018-01-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-08-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-08-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
WIRE ROPE INDUSTRIES LTD. - INDUSTRIES DE CABLES D' ACIER LTEE
Pointe-Claire, Quebec CA
WIRE ROPE INDUSTRIES LTD. - INDUSTRIES DE CABLES D' ACIER LTEE
Pointe-Claire, Quebec CA
Correspondent
Maureen Beacom Gorman MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP 233 South Wacker Drive 6300 WillisTower Chicago, IL 60606-6357
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-06-08
Status Date:
2019-08-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.