Brandinium

Trademark search for:

E EXAMPLE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-08-13 — Application filed
  • 2014-01-23 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2014-01-24 — Application filed
  • 2014-01-25 — Application filed
  • 2014-01-25 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-01-28 — Data modification completed
  • 2014-01-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2014-01-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-01-29 — Application filed
  • 2014-01-30 — Office action issued
  • 2014-01-30 — Office action issued
  • 2014-01-30 — Office action issued
  • 2014-02-18 — Office action issued
  • 2014-03-20 — Correction created for ib
  • 2014-03-20 — Correction sent to ib
  • 2014-07-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-07-30 — Office action issued
  • 2014-07-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-08-13 — Suspension letter written
  • 2014-08-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-08-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2014-10-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2014-10-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-10-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-10-09 — Office action issued
  • 2014-10-09 — Office action issued
  • 2014-10-09 — Office action issued
  • 2014-11-17 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2014-11-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-11-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-12-01 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2014-12-01 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2014-12-01 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2015-01-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2015-01-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2015-01-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2015-01-29 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2015-01-29 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-01-29 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2015-02-02 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2015-02-05 — Data modification completed
  • 2015-02-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2015-02-10 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2015-02-25 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2015-02-25 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2015-02-25 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2015-03-13 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2015-03-17 — Published for opposition
  • 2015-03-17 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2015-06-02 — Registered-principal register
  • 2015-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-10-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2020-06-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2021-12-17 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2022-08-17 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2022-09-23 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2022-09-23 — Invalidation processed
  • 2022-10-24 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
  • 2023-08-12 — Final status recorded
  • 2024-03-10 — Death of international registration
  • 2024-03-10 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

Elliot Gleave t/a Example
London GB
Elliot Gleave t/a Example
London GB
Elliot Gleave t/a Example
London GB

Correspondent

Brian M. Davis VLP Law Group LLP
5960 Fairview Rd, Suite 400
Charlotte, NC 28210
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-08-13
Status Date:
2023-08-12
Category:
Metals
Filing Year:
2013

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.