Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Metals ›
2014 ›
SO ›
SOWCHOICE SYSTEMS
Trademark search for:
SOWCHOICE SYSTEMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-08-19 — Application filed
2014-08-22 — Application filed
2014-09-02 — Application filed
2014-09-03 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2014-12-04 — Assigned to examiner
2014-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2014-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-02 — Office action issued
2015-06-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-06-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-12-15 — Office action issued
2015-12-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-12-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-01-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-01-14 — Office action issued
2016-01-14 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2016-01-14 — Office action issued
2016-01-14 — Office action issued
2016-01-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-01-29 — Suspension letter written
2016-01-29 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-01-29 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-08-13 — Assigned to lie
2016-08-17 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2016-09-01 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-09-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-09-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2017-02-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2017-02-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-03-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-03-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-03-15 — Suspension letter written
2017-03-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-03-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-09-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2017-09-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-09-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-09-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-10-04 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-10-24 — Published for opposition
2017-10-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-12-19 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-06-12 — Use amendment filed
2018-06-12 — Teas statement of use received
2018-07-02 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-07-02 — Statement of use processing complete
2018-07-04 — Final disposition recorded
2018-07-04 — Final disposition recorded
2018-07-04 — Final disposition recorded
2018-11-30 — Office action issued
2018-12-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-12-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-12-12 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2018-12-13 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2019-01-15 — Registered-principal register
2024-01-15 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2024-04-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2024-04-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2024-04-18 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2024-04-18 — Teas change of owner address received
2024-04-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2024-04-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2025-07-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-07-25 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Canarm Ltd.
Brockville, Ontario CA
Canarm Ltd.
Brockville, Ontario CA
Canarm Ltd.
Brockville, Ontario CA
Correspondent
Michael H. Smith Hall Estill Hardwick Gable Golden & Nelson, P.C. 100 North Broadway Avenue, Suite 2900 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 United States
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-08-19
Status Date:
2025-07-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.