Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Non-metal Building Materials ›
1977 ›
TH ›
THE STRONGEST NAME IN POOLS
Trademark search for:
THE STRONGEST NAME IN POOLS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1977-01-10 — Application filed
1984-08-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1985-01-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
1999-02-01 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
1999-03-11 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-01-14 — Case file in ticrs
2009-04-01 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2009-04-22 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2009-04-22 — Assigned to paralegal
2009-04-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2014-10-08 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2018-04-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-12-19 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2021-02-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-02-04 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-02-04 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-02-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-02-04 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2021-02-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CARDINAL SYSTEMS, INC.
SCHUYLKILL HAVEN , PA
FOX POOL CORPORATION
YORK , PA
Correspondent
Scott F. Landis Barley Snyder LLP 126 East King Street Lancaster, PA 17602 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1977-01-10
Status Date:
2021-10-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.