Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Non-metal Building Materials ›
1982 ›
GY ›
GYOTOKU
Trademark search for:
GYOTOKU
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1982-06-08 — Application filed
1983-01-12 — Final disposition recorded
1983-08-08 — Correspondence received in law office
1983-09-08 — Office action issued
1983-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
1983-11-18 — Allowance/count withdrawn
1983-12-15 — Office action issued
1984-01-12 — Correspondence received in law office
1984-03-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
1984-04-23 — Notice of publication
1984-06-19 — Published for opposition
1984-09-11 — Registered-principal register
1990-09-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
1990-12-06 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
1990-12-31 — Response received to post reg. action
1991-01-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2004-09-16 — Paper received
2004-09-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-10-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-10-26 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-03-07 — Case file in ticrs
2011-03-24 — Case file in ticrs
2016-03-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-03-25 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
CERAMICA GYOTOKU LTDA.
SAO PAULO BR
Ceramica Gyotoku Ltda.
Sao Paulo SP BR
Ceramica Gyotoku Ltda.
Sao Paulo SP BR
Correspondent
PETER S SLOANE OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP 1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK, NY 10036-8403 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1982-06-08
Status Date:
2016-03-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.