Trademark search for:

TECH-WOOD

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1998-12-04 — Application filed
1999-05-25 — Assigned to examiner
1999-05-25 — Final disposition recorded
1999-10-25 — Correspondence received in law office
1999-12-03 — Letter of suspension mailed
2000-11-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-01-19 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2001-01-19 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2001-02-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-05-09 — Notice of publication
2001-05-22 — Published for opposition
2001-08-14 — Registered-principal register
2007-02-09 — Case file in ticrs
2007-02-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-02-26 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2007-02-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2007-03-20 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-03-31 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-07-28 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2011-07-30 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-07-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2013-05-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-08-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-02-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-02-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

VAN DIJK, DIRK
BENENDEN, KENT TN17 EU GB

VAN DIJK, DIRK
BENENDEN, KENT TN17 EU GB

VAN DIJK, DIRK
BENENDEN, KENT TN17 EU GB

Correspondent

SCOTT D WOLDOW SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NW
Suite 400
WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1998-12-04

Status Date:
2022-02-25

Category:
Non-metal Building Materials

Filing Year:
1998

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.