Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Non-metal Building Materials ›
2004 ›
CO ›
COMPEDES
Trademark search for:
COMPEDES
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-05-18 — Application filed
2011-05-21 — Application filed
2011-05-22 — Application filed
2011-06-20 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2011-06-29 — Assigned to lie
2011-07-01 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2011-09-05 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-05 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-05 — Assigned to examiner
2011-09-05 — Final disposition recorded
2011-12-05 — Office action issued
2011-12-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-12-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-12-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-12-30 — Law office publication review completed
2012-01-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-02-07 — Published for opposition
2012-02-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-04-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-10-02 — Sou teas extension received
2012-10-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-10-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-10-04 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-05-06 — Application abandoned
2013-05-06 — Application abandoned
2013-05-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Lely Patent N.V.
Maassluis NL
Lely Patent N.V.
Maassluis NL
Correspondent
ROBERT W. SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD & GERALDS 311 S WACKER DR STE 5000 CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-05-18
Status Date:
2013-05-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.