Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Non-metal Building Materials ›
2004 ›
SY ›
SYNTERFLEX
Trademark search for:
SYNTERFLEX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-05-21 — Application filed
2004-11-12 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2004-11-16 — Application filed
2004-12-20 — Assigned to examiner
2004-12-22 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2005-02-10 — Office action issued
2005-05-20 — Paper received
2005-05-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-06-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-06-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-06-28 — Assigned to lie
2005-06-28 — Law office publication review completed
2005-09-28 — Notice of publication
2005-10-18 — Published for opposition
2006-01-10 — Registered-principal register
2006-08-10 — Final disposition recorded
2006-08-30 — Final disposition recorded
2006-08-30 — Final disposition recorded
2007-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
2013-09-06 — Cancelled section 71
2014-05-06 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2014-05-22 — Final status recorded
2014-08-09 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2014-11-14 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2014-12-05 — Death of international registration
2014-12-05 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
Owner Information
SYSTEM S.p.A.
IT
SYSTEM S.p.A.
IT
SYSTEM S.p.A.
IT
Correspondent
ALBERTO GIANELLI (ALBO PROT N 229 BM) VIA EMILIA E 25 I MODENA, 41100 ITALY
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-05-21
Status Date:
2014-05-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.