Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Non-metal Building Materials ›
2010 ›
MA ›
MATEENDOWEL
Trademark search for:
MATEENDOWEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-04-23 — Application filed
2010-04-27 — Application filed
2010-04-28 — Application filed
2010-06-29 — Assigned to examiner
2010-06-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-07-17 — Assigned to lie
2010-07-17 — Law office publication review completed
2010-08-24 — Published for opposition
2010-08-24 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-10-19 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-04-18 — Paper received
2011-04-18 — Use amendment filed
2011-04-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-04-21 — Statement of use processing complete
2011-05-10 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2011-05-11 — Law office registration review completed
2011-05-12 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2011-06-14 — Registered-principal register
2015-02-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-06-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-04-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-12-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-12-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-01-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2018-01-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Pultron Composites Limited
Gisborne NZ
Pultron Composites Limited
Gisborne NZ
Pultron Composites Limited
Gisborne NZ
Correspondent
DONALD L. DENNISON Mark Lebow, Ladas & Parry 1700 Diagonal Road Suite 505 Alexandria, VA 22314
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-04-23
Status Date:
2018-01-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.