Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PEARL-GLO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-10-16 — Application filed
  • 2008-10-20 — Application filed
  • 2008-10-21 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2009-01-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-01-22 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-01-22 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-01-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-01-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-01-22 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-01-22 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-01-22 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-01-22 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-01-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-01-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-01-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-02-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-02-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-02-18 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-03-10 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-06-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-12-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-01-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-01-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-01-26 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2010-01-26 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-01-26 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-03-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-03-16 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-03-17 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-06-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2010-07-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-07-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2010-08-06 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2010-08-06 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2010-08-06 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2010-08-11 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-08-12 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-12-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-01-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-01-03 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-01-12 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2011-01-12 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2011-01-12 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2011-01-18 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-01-19 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-05-25 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-05-25 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2011-05-31 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2011-06-01 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-12-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-12-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-12-02 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2011-12-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-12-06 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2011-12-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-06-02 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-06-04 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2012-07-30 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-08-21 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-08-21 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-08-22 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2012-09-25 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-09-25 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2019-04-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2019-04-26 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BASF Catalysts, LLC
Florham Park , NJ
BASF Catalysts, LLC
Florham Park , NJ
BASF Catalysts, LLC
Florham Park , NJ

Correspondent

Lile H. Deinard Dorsey & Whitney LLP
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-10-16
Status Date:
2019-04-26
Category:
Paints
Filing Year:
1970

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.