Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
1982 ›
SK ›
SKILL LEARNING SYSTEMS
Trademark search for:
SKILL LEARNING SYSTEMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1982-01-18 — Application filed
1982-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
1982-05-21 — Final disposition recorded
1983-07-29 — Correspondence received in law office
1983-09-30 — Office action issued
1984-03-30 — Correspondence received in law office
1984-04-06 — Approved for registration supplemental register
1984-07-31 — Registered-supplemental register
1990-07-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
1990-09-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2002-04-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-06-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-07-28 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2004-07-28 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-09-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-09-16 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-03-07 — Case file in ticrs
2011-03-24 — Case file in ticrs
2011-12-14 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2011-12-21 — Review of correspondence complete - power of attorney entered
2016-03-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-03-25 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Productivity Training Corporation
SAN JOSE , CA
Productivity Training Corporation
Mountain View , CA
Correspondent
KARL D. CHANDLER HOGE FENTON JONES & APPEL 60 S MARKET ST STE 1400 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1982-01-18
Status Date:
2016-03-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.