Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
1988 ›
SU ›
SURPLUS CASH FLOW
Trademark search for:
SURPLUS CASH FLOW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1988-10-17 — Application filed
1989-01-12 — Assigned to examiner
1989-01-24 — Final disposition recorded
1989-07-03 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
1989-08-29 — Correspondence received in law office
1990-01-18 — Final disposition recorded
1990-03-01 — Correspondence received in law office
1990-03-21 — Approved for registration supplemental register
1990-07-17 — Registered-supplemental register
1995-08-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
1996-04-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2000-07-11 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2001-04-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2001-04-04 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2006-01-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-01-16 — Teas change of owner address received
2008-12-09 — Case file in ticrs
2010-04-05 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2010-04-13 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2010-04-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2019-07-17 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-10-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-10-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SCF PARTNERS, L.P.
New York , NY
SCF PARTNERS, L.P.
NEW YORK , NY
Correspondent
ROBERT L. RENCK, JR. SCF PARTNERS, L.P. 116 WEST 23RD STREET SUITE 500 NEW YORK, NY 10011
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1988-10-17
Status Date:
2021-10-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.