Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PORGY AND BESS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1995-07-20 — Application filed
  • 1995-12-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1995-12-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1996-01-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1996-02-16 — Notice of publication
  • 1996-03-19 — Published for opposition
  • 1996-06-11 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 1996-12-11 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 1997-02-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 1997-06-11 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 1997-07-02 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 1997-12-10 — Use amendment filed
  • 1998-01-30 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 1998-02-09 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1998-03-14 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 1998-05-19 — Registered-principal register
  • 2003-07-11 — Paper received
  • 2003-07-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 2003-08-29 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2007-08-22 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2008-10-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-10-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-02-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2009-02-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

PORGY AND BESS ENTERPRISES
New York , NY
PORGY AND BESS ENTERPRISES
New York , NY
PORGY AND BESS ENTERPRISES
New York , NY

Correspondent

Alexander P. Hartnett Sukin Law Group
1501 Broadway
30th Floor
New York, NY 10036

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1995-07-20
Status Date:
2009-02-21
Filing Year:
1994

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.