Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
1999 ›
IN ›
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM
Trademark search for:
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1999-06-01 — Application filed
1999-09-13 — Assigned to examiner
1999-09-15 — Assigned to examiner
1999-09-17 — Final disposition recorded
1999-12-08 — Assigned to examiner
2000-03-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2000-04-26 — Office action issued
2000-11-06 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2000-11-06 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2000-12-20 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2000-12-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-01-24 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2001-01-25 — Final disposition recorded
2001-07-25 — Use amendment filed
2001-07-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-08-24 — Amendment to use processing complete
2001-09-12 — Use amendment accepted
2001-09-12 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2001-10-31 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2001-11-01 — Letter of suspension mailed
2002-05-20 — Assigned to examiner
2003-02-10 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2003-09-25 — Application abandoned
2003-09-25 — Final status recorded
2003-09-26 — Exparte appeal terminated
Owner Information
Software Human Resource Council (Canada) Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 5L4 CA
Correspondent
NATHANIEL A HUMPHRIES THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP MARKET SQ STE 800 701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2608
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1999-06-01
Status Date:
2003-09-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.