Trademark search for:

WE BUILD BETTER READERS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2000-02-29 — Application filed
2000-07-27 — Assigned to examiner
2000-08-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-10-20 — Notice of publication
2000-11-21 — Published for opposition
2001-02-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2001-08-21 — Petition to revive-received
2002-02-19 — Application abandoned
2002-05-22 — Petition to revive-granted
2002-05-23 — Assigned to examiner
2002-06-11 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2002-09-17 — Registered-principal register
2003-03-10 — Paper received
2003-03-31 — Paper received
2004-10-27 — Paper received
2006-09-20 — Review of correspondence complete
2008-01-16 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2008-01-25 — Case file in ticrs
2008-03-05 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2009-05-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2009-05-16 — Final status recorded
2011-09-28 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2012-07-18 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2012-07-26 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
BOSTON , MA

Cognitive Concepts, Inc.
Evanston , IL

Cognitive Concepts, Inc.
Evanston , IL

Cognitive Concepts, Inc.
Evanston , IL

Correspondent

JOANNA L SACAVITCH GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP
P O BOX 77630
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107-0630
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-02-29

Status Date:
2009-05-16

Category:
Paper Goods & Printing

Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.