Brandinium

Trademark search for:

FAIRYOLOGY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-08-26 — Application filed
  • 2003-01-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-01-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-06-23 — Fax received
  • 2003-06-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-07-29 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2003-07-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-09-24 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-10-14 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-01-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2004-06-11 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2005-01-06 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2005-03-05 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2005-03-05 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2005-03-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-03-16 — New noa to issue
  • 2005-05-10 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2005-11-08 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2005-11-08 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2005-11-22 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2006-05-10 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2006-05-19 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2006-06-09 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2006-06-10 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2006-07-05 — Paper received
  • 2006-07-05 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2006-09-27 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2006-09-29 — Petition granted - extension request filed
  • 2006-11-02 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2006-11-02 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-11-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-11-02 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2006-12-19 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2007-05-01 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-05-01 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2007-05-01 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2007-11-10 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2007-12-19 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-12-19 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-12-28 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2007-12-28 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2007-12-28 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2008-01-10 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2008-01-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-05-07 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2008-05-07 — Use amendment filed
  • 2008-05-19 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2008-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-12-09 — Office action issued
  • 2008-12-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-12-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-02-05 — Office action issued
  • 2009-02-06 — Office action issued
  • 2009-08-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-08-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-08-06 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2009-08-06 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2009-08-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-08-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-08-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-09-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-02-13 — Su-examiner's amendment written
  • 2010-02-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2010-02-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-02-19 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-03-30 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-11-04 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-11-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

JADE, BRACHA
Los Angeles , CA
JADE, BRACHA
Los Angeles , CA
JADE, BRACHA
BURBANK , CA

Correspondent

Bracha Jade
1389 Frackelton Place
Los Angeles, CA 90041
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-08-26
Status Date:
2016-11-04
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.