Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2002 ›
MA ›
MAGICVISION
Trademark search for:
MAGICVISION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-01-15 — Application filed
2002-03-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-05-01 — Assigned to examiner
2002-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
2002-11-12 — Paper received
2002-11-12 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-12-17 — Office action issued
2003-06-11 — Paper received
2003-06-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-07-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-08-20 — Notice of publication
2003-09-09 — Published for opposition
2003-12-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-06-02 — Sou teas extension received
2004-06-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-06-07 — Case file in ticrs
2004-06-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-11-17 — Paper received
2004-11-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
2004-12-13 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-05-26 — Paper received
2005-05-26 — Sou extension 3 filed
2005-05-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
2005-10-18 — Sou teas extension received
2005-10-18 — Sou extension 4 granted
2005-10-18 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-05-18 — Sou teas extension received
2006-05-18 — Sou extension 5 filed
2006-05-18 — Sou extension 5 granted
2006-12-03 — Final status recorded
2007-02-08 — Application abandoned
2007-02-08 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Soremartec S.A.
Schoppach-Arlon BE
Soremartec S.A.
Schoppach-Arlon BE
Correspondent
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC 1425 K ST NW STE 800 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-01-15
Status Date:
2006-12-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.