Brandinium

Trademark search for:

POLICE DEPARTMENT CHANDLER ARIZONA 1912 DITAT DEUS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-08-02 — Application filed
  • 2003-01-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-02-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-06-20 — Paper received
  • 2003-06-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-07-07 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2003-10-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-11-24 — Paper received
  • 2003-11-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-12-29 — Sec. 1(a) claim deleted
  • 2003-12-29 — Sec. 1(b) claim added
  • 2004-01-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2004-02-05 — Paper received
  • 2004-04-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2004-05-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-07-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2005-01-24 — Paper received
  • 2005-01-24 — Use amendment filed
  • 2005-02-14 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2005-02-16 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2005-02-18 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-03-16 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2005-05-31 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-01-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2012-01-06 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Chandler Police Department
Chandler , AZ
Chandler Police Department
Chandler , AZ
Chandler Police Department
Chandler , AZ

Correspondent

PAUL C MEISSNER CHANDLER POLICE DEPT
MAIL STOP #303
P O BOX 4008
CHANDLER, AZ 85244

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-08-02
Status Date:
2012-01-06
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.