Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2004 ›
DA ›
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS
Trademark search for:
DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-03-30 — Application filed
2004-04-15 — Application filed
2004-10-17 — Assigned to examiner
2004-10-25 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-26 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-21 — Office action issued
2005-01-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-01-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-02-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-02-11 — Assigned to lie
2005-02-15 — Law office publication review completed
2005-05-11 — Notice of publication
2005-05-31 — Published for opposition
2005-08-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-11-21 — Sou teas extension received
2005-11-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-12-03 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-05-25 — Sou teas extension received
2006-05-25 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-06-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-11-28 — Sou teas extension received
2006-11-28 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-01-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-08-24 — Final status recorded
2007-12-07 — Application abandoned
2007-12-07 — Application abandoned
2008-03-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-03-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Executive Machines, Inc.
Brooklyn , NY
Executive Machines, Inc.
Brooklyn , NY
Correspondent
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.P. Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street 22nd Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-03-30
Status Date:
2007-08-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.