Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DIBO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-06-04 — Application filed
  • 2006-11-02 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2006-11-03 — Application filed
  • 2006-11-03 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-11-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-11-09 — Office action issued
  • 2006-11-13 — Office action issued
  • 2006-11-13 — Office action issued
  • 2006-12-08 — Office action issued
  • 2007-04-27 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-04-27 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-05-11 — Office action issued
  • 2007-05-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-05-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-09-20 — New representative at ib received
  • 2007-11-19 — Office action issued
  • 2007-11-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-11-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-11-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-01-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-01-10 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-01-18 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2008-01-24 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2008-01-24 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-01-24 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-01-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-01-24 — New representative at ib received
  • 2008-01-24 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-01-25 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2008-02-06 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-02-26 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-03-19 — Opposition papers received at ttab
  • 2008-03-20 — Office action issued
  • 2008-03-20 — Office action issued
  • 2008-03-21 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2008-04-10 — Office action issued
  • 2009-12-03 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
  • 2009-12-18 — Correction transaction received from ib
  • 2009-12-18 — Uspto correction processed by ib
  • 2010-01-07 — Correction from ib entered - no review required
  • 2010-02-03 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2010-02-03 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2010-03-09 — Registered-principal register
  • 2010-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-24 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-02-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-04-24 — New representative at ib received
  • 2014-07-24 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
  • 2015-06-12 — Teas section 71 received
  • 2015-06-18 — International registration renewed
  • 2015-07-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2015-07-07 — Registered-sec.71 accepted
  • 2015-07-07 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 - e-mailed
  • 2019-03-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (10-yr) e-mailed
  • 2019-08-22 — New representative at ib received
  • 2021-02-26 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2021-10-26 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2021-11-23 — Invalidation processed
  • 2021-11-23 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
  • 2022-01-14 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
  • 2025-01-09 — New representative at ib received
  • 2025-06-05 — Final status recorded
  • 2025-12-18 — Death of international registration
  • 2025-12-18 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

OCON INC.
KR
OCON INC.
Seochogu; Seoul KR
OCON INC.
Seochogu; Seoul KR

Correspondent

Brent E. Routman Merchant & Gould P.C.
P.O. Box 2910
Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-06-04
Status Date:
2025-06-05
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.