Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2005 ›
FI ›
FILCOX
Trademark search for:
FILCOX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-07-28 — Application filed
2005-08-04 — Application filed
2006-02-15 — Assigned to examiner
2006-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2006-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2006-08-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-08-16 — Office action issued
2006-08-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-08-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-08-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-09-01 — Assigned to lie
2006-09-07 — Law office publication review completed
2006-10-04 — Notice of publication
2006-10-24 — Published for opposition
2007-01-16 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-07-16 — Sou teas extension received
2007-07-16 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-07-16 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-01-16 — Teas statement of use received
2008-01-16 — Use amendment filed
2008-02-11 — Statement of use processing complete
2008-02-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2008-03-11 — Law office registration review completed
2008-03-11 — Assigned to lie
2008-04-15 — Registered-principal register
2014-11-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-11-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Cox, Philip
Houma , LA
Cox, Philip
Houma , LA
Cox, Philip
Houma , LA
Correspondent
Seth M. Nehrbass GARVEY, SMITH, NEHRBASS & NORTH, L.L.C. 3838 N. Causeway Blvd., Suite 3290 Metairie, LA 70002-1767 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-07-28
Status Date:
2014-11-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.