Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2005 ›
FO ›
FORREST PUBLISHING
Trademark search for:
FORREST PUBLISHING
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-01-20 — Application filed
2005-01-31 — Application filed
2005-08-18 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-21 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-21 — Final disposition recorded
2006-02-14 — Use amendment filed
2006-02-17 — Teas amendment of use received
2006-02-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-02-21 — Paper received
2006-02-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-10 — Amendment to use processing complete
2006-03-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-03-13 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-11-03 — Assigned to examiner
2006-11-15 — Use amendment accepted
2006-12-11 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2006-12-29 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-29 — Law office publication review completed
2007-02-13 — Registered-supplemental register
2013-02-07 — Teas section 8 received
2013-03-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-03-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2013-03-07 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2016-02-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-09-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-09-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Hotze, Steven F.
Katy , TX
Hotze, Steven F.
Katy , TX
Correspondent
Andrew Schlafly ANDREW SCHLAFLY 939 OLD CHESTER RD FAR HILLS, NJ 07931-2657 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-01-20
Status Date:
2017-09-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.