Trademark search for:

NEENAH CHATEAU

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-04-13 — Application filed
2006-04-19 — Application filed
2006-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
2006-09-28 — Priority action written
2006-09-28 — Priority action e-mailed
2006-10-02 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-10-02 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-10-02 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-10-02 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-10-02 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-10-02 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-10-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-10-13 — Assigned to lie
2006-10-20 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-10-20 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-10-20 — Law office publication review completed
2006-11-22 — Notice of publication
2006-12-12 — Published for opposition
2007-03-06 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-09-04 — Sou teas extension received
2007-09-04 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-09-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-10-25 — Assigned to examiner
2008-03-03 — Sou teas extension received
2008-03-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-03-03 — Assigned to examiner
2008-03-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-10-27 — Application abandoned
2008-10-27 — Application abandoned
2008-10-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

NEENAH PAPER, INC.
Alpharetta , GA

NEENAH PAPER, INC.
Alpharetta , GA

Correspondent

James M. Bagarazzi, Jason W. Johnston and William DORITY & MANNING, P.A.
PO BOX 1449
GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-04-13

Status Date:
2008-10-27

Category:
Paper Goods & Printing

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.