Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2006 ›
SE ›
SEDUCTIVE SELLING
Trademark search for:
SEDUCTIVE SELLING
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-09 — Application filed
2006-05-12 — Application filed
2006-10-03 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-04 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-06 — Office action issued
2006-10-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-10-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-01 — Office action issued
2006-11-01 — Office action issued
2006-11-06 — Office action issued
2006-11-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-11-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-12-07 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-07 — Law office publication review completed
2007-01-10 — Notice of publication
2007-01-30 — Published for opposition
2007-04-17 — Registered-principal register
2013-02-15 — Teas change of correspondence received
2013-02-15 — Teas section 8 received
2013-03-09 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-03-09 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2013-03-09 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2016-04-17 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-11-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2017-11-24 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Garber, Craig
Lutz , FL
Garber, Craig
Lutz , FL
Garber, Craig
Lutz , FL
Correspondent
Garber, Craig 3959 Van Dyke Road #253 Lutz, FL 33558 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-09
Status Date:
2017-11-24
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.