Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2007 ›
SH ›
SHIV KHERA
Trademark search for:
SHIV KHERA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-07-30 — Application filed
2007-08-02 — Application filed
2007-11-03 — Assigned to examiner
2007-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2007-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2007-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2007-11-28 — Office action issued
2007-11-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-11-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-12-17 — Suspension letter written
2007-12-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-12-17 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-12-27 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2007-12-27 — Office action issued
2008-01-15 — Suspension letter written
2008-01-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-01-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-07-15 — Suspension inquiry written
2008-07-15 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2008-07-15 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2008-07-15 — Assigned to lie
2008-07-15 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-01-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2009-01-08 — Suspension letter written
2009-01-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-01-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-01-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-01-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
2009-07-08 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-07-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-01-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-02-08 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2010-07-08 — Assigned to examiner
2010-08-09 — Suspension inquiry written
2010-08-09 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2010-08-09 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2011-02-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-02-15 — Suspension letter written
2011-02-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-02-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-02-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-02-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-08-15 — Suspension inquiry written
2011-08-15 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2011-08-15 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2012-02-14 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2012-02-27 — Final disposition recorded
2012-02-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-02-27 — Final disposition recorded
2012-02-27 — Final disposition recorded
2012-04-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-08-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-08-27 — Office action issued
2012-08-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-09-04 — Office action issued
2012-09-04 — Office action issued
2012-09-04 — Office action issued
2013-03-04 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2013-03-04 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2013-03-04 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2013-03-04 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2013-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2013-03-22 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2013-03-22 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2013-06-05 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2013-07-22 — Application abandoned
2013-07-22 — Exparte appeal terminated
2013-07-22 — Final status recorded
2013-07-29 — Application abandoned
Correspondent
THOMAS F DUNN MORSE & BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON PC CITY POINT 230 THIRD AVENUE 4TH FLOOR WALTHAM, MA 02451
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-07-30
Status Date:
2013-07-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.