Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SAN FRANCISCO CONFIDENTIAL

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-06-03 — Application filed
  • 2004-06-09 — Application filed
  • 2005-01-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-01-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-01-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-07-06 — Office action issued
  • 2005-07-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-07-13 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-07-13 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-07-14 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-07-14 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-11-01 — Paper received
  • 2005-12-08 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-01-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-07-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-09-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2006-09-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2006-11-08 — Paper received
  • 2006-11-29 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-12-08 — Unresponsive/duplicate paper received
  • 2006-12-08 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-01-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-06-20 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2007-07-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-01-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-01-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-07-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-01-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2009-02-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-02-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-08-11 — Office action issued
  • 2009-08-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-08-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-08-27 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-08-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2009-12-23 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2010-03-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-05-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-05-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-09-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-03-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-09-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-03-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-06-27 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2012-09-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2013-03-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2013-09-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-03-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-09-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2015-03-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2015-09-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2015-11-25 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2016-03-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2016-09-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2017-03-30 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2017-10-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2017-10-21 — Office action issued
  • 2017-10-23 — Office action issued
  • 2018-04-23 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-04-23 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2018-04-23 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2018-04-23 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2018-04-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2018-04-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-04-25 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2018-04-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-05-09 — Notice of publication
  • 2018-05-29 — Published for opposition
  • 2018-07-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2019-01-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2019-01-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2019-01-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2019-01-26 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2019-07-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2019-07-24 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2019-07-24 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2019-07-26 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2019-08-09 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
  • 2019-11-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2019-11-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-01-23 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2020-01-23 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2020-01-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2020-01-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2020-07-24 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2020-07-24 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2020-07-24 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2020-07-28 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2021-01-25 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2021-01-25 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2021-02-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2021-02-09 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2021-02-10 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2021-08-30 — Application abandoned
  • 2021-08-30 — Application abandoned
  • 2021-08-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DM LUXURY, LLC
ATLANTA , GA
DM LUXURY, LLC
ATLANTA , GA
MODERN LUXURY MEDIA, LLC
CHICAGO , IL
Modern Luxury, Inc.
Chicago , IL

Correspondent

A. John P. Mancini MAYER BROWN LLP
P.O. Box 2828
Chicago, IL 60690-2828
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-06-03
Status Date:
2021-08-30
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.