Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2009 ›
EL ›
ELECTRAPLUS
Trademark search for:
ELECTRAPLUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-01-26 — Application filed
2009-01-29 — Application filed
2009-01-30 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-04-07 — Assigned to examiner
2009-04-13 — Suspension letter written
2009-04-13 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-04-13 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-10-13 — Assigned to lie
2009-10-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-10-14 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-10-14 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2009-10-14 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2009-10-19 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2009-10-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-10-22 — Suspension letter written
2009-10-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-10-22 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-04-22 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-04-29 — Suspension inquiry written
2010-04-29 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2010-04-29 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2010-10-07 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-10-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-10-21 — Suspension letter written
2010-10-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-10-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-04-22 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2011-04-29 — Suspension inquiry written
2011-04-29 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2011-04-29 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2011-09-09 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-09-16 — Suspension letter written
2011-09-16 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-09-16 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-09-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-09-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-03-29 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2012-04-04 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-04-04 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2012-04-04 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2012-06-04 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2012-06-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-06-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-06-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-06-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-06-13 — Law office publication review completed
2012-06-27 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-07-17 — Published for opposition
2012-07-17 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-10-02 — Registered-principal register
2012-10-10 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2012-10-17 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2014-11-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-10-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2018-08-30 — Teas section 8 received
2018-09-01 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2018-09-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2018-09-01 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2018-12-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-10-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2023-04-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-04-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Catalyst Paper Corporation
Richmond CA
Catalyst Paper Corporation
Richmond CA
Catalyst Paper Corporation
Richmond CA
Correspondent
ARLENE D. HANKS Moore & Van Allen PLLC 100 North Tryon Street Suite 4700 Charlotte, NC 28202-4003
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-01-26
Status Date:
2023-04-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.