Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2009 ›
PE ›
PERFECT PEARLS
Trademark search for:
PERFECT PEARLS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-08-19 — Application filed
2009-08-24 — Application filed
2009-08-24 — Application filed
2009-11-22 — Assigned to examiner
2009-11-27 — Priority action mailed
2009-11-27 — Priority action written
2010-05-27 — Office action issued
2010-05-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-05-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-06-15 — Suspension letter written
2010-06-16 — Letter of suspension mailed
2010-12-28 — Office action issued
2010-12-28 — Office action issued
2011-06-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2011-06-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-06-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-07-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-07-27 — Assigned to lie
2011-07-27 — Law office publication review completed
2011-08-10 — Notice of publication
2011-08-30 — Published for opposition
2011-10-25 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-04-25 — Sou teas extension received
2012-04-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-04-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-04-27 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-11-26 — Application abandoned
2012-11-26 — Application abandoned
2012-11-26 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Andrus, Julia
Cottonwood Heights , UT
Andrus, Julia
Cottonwood Heights , UT
Correspondent
GRANT R. CLAYTON CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON, P.C. PO BOX 1909 SANDY, UT 84091-1909 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-08-19
Status Date:
2012-11-26
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.