Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2010 ›
DI ›
DIVORCE TOOLBOX
Trademark search for:
DIVORCE TOOLBOX
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-05-28 — Application filed
2010-06-01 — Application filed
2010-06-02 — Application filed
2010-06-03 — Notice of design search code mailed
2010-09-10 — Assigned to examiner
2010-09-15 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-09-15 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-09-15 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-09-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-09-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-09-24 — Assigned to lie
2010-09-24 — Law office publication review completed
2010-11-02 — Published for opposition
2010-11-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-12-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-06-28 — Teas statement of use received
2011-06-28 — Use amendment filed
2011-07-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-07-01 — Statement of use processing complete
2011-07-22 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2011-07-22 — Law office registration review completed
2011-07-23 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2011-08-30 — Registered-principal register
2018-04-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2018-04-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sildrey, LLC
Dothan , AL
Sildrey, LLC
Dothan , AL
Sildrey, LLC
Dothan , AL
Correspondent
BRIAN D. BELLAMY CLARK & BELLAMY, P.C. PO BOX 1997 THOMASVILLE, GA 31799-1997 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-05-28
Status Date:
2018-04-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.