Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2011 ›
LA ›
LAURIE LIPTON
Trademark search for:
LAURIE LIPTON
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-02-02 — Application filed
2011-02-05 — Application filed
2011-02-07 — Application filed
2011-05-03 — Assigned to examiner
2011-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
2011-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
2011-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
2011-09-06 — Office action issued
2011-09-07 — Assigned to lie
2011-09-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-09-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-09-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-09-16 — Law office publication review completed
2011-10-25 — Published for opposition
2011-10-25 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-01-10 — Registered-principal register
2017-01-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-12-30 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2018-01-22 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2018-01-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2018-01-22 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2021-01-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-07-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-07-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Lipton, Laurie
Los Angeles , CA
Lipton, Laurie
London GB
Lipton, Laurie
London GB
Correspondent
Shelley M. Liberto Law Offices of Shelley M. Liberto 9042 Garfield Ave.,, Ste. 312 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-02-02
Status Date:
2022-07-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.