Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2012 ›
CH ›
CHOCHOLISTIC
Trademark search for:
CHOCHOLISTIC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-05-09 — Application filed
2012-05-12 — Application filed
2012-05-16 — Application filed
2012-05-17 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-29 — Assigned to examiner
2012-08-29 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-02-14 — Office action issued
2013-02-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-02-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-02-27 — Assigned to lie
2013-02-27 — Law office publication review completed
2013-03-13 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-04-02 — Published for opposition
2013-04-02 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-05-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-11-18 — Sou teas extension received
2013-11-18 — Sou extension 1 filed
2013-12-31 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-01-08 — Sou extension 1 granted
2014-01-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2014-06-30 — Application abandoned
2014-06-30 — Application abandoned
2014-06-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey CH
Societe des Produits Nestle S.A.
1800 Vevey CH
Correspondent
CHRISTA COLE NESTLE USA, INC. TRADEMARK DEPT- 14TH FL 800 N BRAND BLVD GLENDALE, CA 91203-3213
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-05-09
Status Date:
2014-06-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.