Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2015 ›
DI ›
DISTINCT VIEWS
Trademark search for:
DISTINCT VIEWS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-05-08 — Application filed
2015-05-12 — Application filed
2015-05-18 — Application filed
2015-08-19 — Assigned to examiner
2015-08-19 — Examiners amendment -written
2015-08-19 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-08-19 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2015-08-19 — Examiner's amendment entered
2015-08-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-09-14 — Assigned to lie
2015-09-16 — Law office publication review completed
2015-09-30 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-10-20 — Published for opposition
2015-10-20 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-12-15 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-06-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2016-07-11 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2016-07-11 — Teas petition to revive received
2016-07-11 — Petition to revive-granted
2016-07-11 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2016-08-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-08-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2016-08-23 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2017-01-16 — Application abandoned
2017-01-16 — Final status recorded
2017-01-17 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Richard James Williams
Southfield , MI
Richard James Williams
Southfield , MI
Correspondent
SCOTT D. BARNETT Troutman Sanders LLP 55 W Monroe St Ste 3000 Chicago, IL 60603-5097
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-05-08
Status Date:
2017-01-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.