Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Paper Goods & Printing ›
2016 ›
ME ›
METAPHYSICAL MOMS
Trademark search for:
METAPHYSICAL MOMS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-02-07 — Application filed
2016-02-10 — Application filed
2016-02-11 — Application filed
2016-05-03 — Assigned to examiner
2016-05-09 — Examiners amendment -written
2016-05-09 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-05-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-05-09 — Assigned to lie
2016-05-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
2016-06-07 — Final disposition recorded
2016-06-07 — Final disposition recorded
2016-06-07 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-18 — Teas amendment of use received
2016-10-14 — Use amendment filed
2016-10-14 — Amendment to use processing complete
2016-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2016-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2016-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-07 — Teas amendment of use received
2017-02-07 — Teas request to divide received
2017-02-23 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2017-02-28 — Office action issued
2017-03-16 — Fax received
2017-04-11 — Request to divide untimely, refused, or withdrawn
2017-08-28 — Final disposition recorded
2017-08-28 — Final disposition recorded
2017-08-28 — Final disposition recorded
2018-03-27 — Application abandoned
2018-03-27 — Final status recorded
2018-03-28 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Edwards, Diane L
Norcross , GA
Correspondent
EDWARDS, DIANE L P.O. BOX 921021 NORCROSS, GA 30010 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-02-07
Status Date:
2018-03-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.