Trademark search for:

BROOKISH & LANKY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2017-12-19 — Application filed
2017-12-22 — Application filed
2018-01-05 — Application filed
2018-01-06 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2018-03-29 — Assigned to examiner
2018-04-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2018-04-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2018-05-08 — Published for opposition
2018-05-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2018-07-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-09-03 — Teas statement of use received
2018-09-03 — Teas request to divide received
2018-09-03 — Divisional request received
2018-09-03 — Use amendment filed
2018-09-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-09-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-09-25 — Divisional processing complete
2018-09-25 — Statement of use processing complete
2018-09-26 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2018-10-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2018-10-20 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2018-11-27 — Registered-principal register
2023-11-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2025-06-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-06-06 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Brookish and Lanky Co.
Raleigh , NC

Brookish and Lanky Co.
Raleigh , NC

Brookish and Lanky Co.
Raleigh , NC

Correspondent

MICHELLE M. WAHL SWANSON, MARTIN & BELL, LLP
330 N. WABASH, SUITE 3300
CHICAGO, IL 60611
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-12-19

Status Date:
2025-06-06

Category:
Paper Goods & Printing

Filing Year:
2017

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.